Canon XVIII.

has come to the knowledge of

the holy and great Synod that, in some districts and cities, the

deacons administer the Eucharist to the presbyters, whereas neither

canon nor custom permits that they who have no right to offer should

give the Body of Christ to them that do offer.  And this also has

been made known, that certain deacons now touch the Eucharist even

before the bishops. Let all such practices be utterly done away, and let the deacons remain within their own bounds, knowing that they are the ministers of the bishop and the inferiors of the presbyters. Let them receive the Eucharist according to their order, after the presbyters, and let either the bishop or the presbyter administer to them. Furthermore, let not the deacons sit among the presbyters, for that is contrary to canon and order. And if, after this decree, any one shall refuse to obey, let him be deposed from the diaconate.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/The First Ecumenical Council/Canons/Canon XVIII

Notes.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/The First Ecumenical Council/Canons/Canon XVIII

Deacons must abide within their own bounds.  They

shall not administer the Eucharist to presbyters, nor touch it before

them, nor sit among the presbyters.  For all this is contrary to

canon, and to decent order.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/The First Ecumenical Council/Canons/Canon XVIII

Four excesses of deacons this canon condemns, at least

indirectly.  The first was that they gave the holy Communion to

presbyters.  To understand more easily the meaning of the canon it

must be remembered that the reference here is not to the presbyters who

were sacrificing at the altar but to those who were offering together

with the bishop who was sacrificing; by a rite not unlike that which

to-day takes place, when the newly ordained presbyters or bishops

celebrate mass with the ordaining bishop; and this rite in old times

was of daily occurrence, for a full account of which see Morinus De SS. Ordinat. P. III. Exercit. viij.…The present canon does not take away from deacons the authority to distribute the Eucharist to laymen, or to the minor clergy, but only reproves their insolence and audacity in presuming to administer to presbyters who were concelebrating with the bishop or another presbyter.…

The second abuse was that certain deacons touched the

sacred gifts before the bishop.  The vulgar version of Isidore

reads for “touched” “received,” a meaning which

Balsamon and Zonaras also adopt, and unless the Greek word, which

signifies “to touch,” is contrary to this translation, it

seems by no means to be alien to the context of the canon.

“Let them receive the Eucharist according to their

order, after the presbyters, and let the bishop or the presbyter

administer to them.”  In these words it is implied that some

deacons had presumed to receive Holy Communion before the presbyters, and this is the third excess of the deacon which is condemned by the Synod.

And lastly, the fourth excess was that they took a place

among the presbyters at the very time of the sacrifice, or “at

the holy altar,” as Balsamon observes.

From this canon we see that the Nicene fathers

entertained no doubt that the faithful in the holy Communion truly

received “the body of Christ.”  Secondly, that that

was “offered” in the church, which is the word by which

sacrifice is designated in the New Testament, and therefore it was at

that time a fixed tradition that there was a sacrifice in which the

body of Christ was offered.  Thirdly that not to all, nor even to

deacons, but only to bishops and presbyters was given the power of

offering.  And lastly, that there was recognized a fixed hierarchy

in the Church, made up of bishops and presbyters and deacons in

subordination to these.

Of course even at that early date there was nothing new

in this doctrine of the Eucharist.  St. Ignatius more than a

century and a half before, wrote as follows:  “But mark ye

those who hold strange doctrine touching the grace of Jesus Christ

which came to us, how that they are contrary to the mind of God. They have no care for love, none for the widow, none for the orphan, none for the afflicted, none for the prisoner, none for the hungry or thirsty. They abstain from eucharist (thanksgiving) and prayer, because they allow not that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ, which flesh suffered for our sins, and which the Father of his goodness raised up.”