[20] _Herodotus_, ii. Diodorus confirms this account, but its authenticity has been disputed by declaring that “the garrison of Elephantine, comprising only some hundreds or thousands of warriors, was the only one that could escape into Ethiopia.” It was doubtless easier for this garrison to cross the frontier which it was appointed to guard; but, supposing the Egyptian soldiers, dissatisfied with the violation of their privileges, had concerted among themselves, as Herodotus declares, we do not see how King Psammetichus could have hindered the departure of so formidable an army. Besides, Herodotus adds that he saw in Ethiopia a people known under the name of _Automoles_ (deserters), descendants of these Egyptian warriors. This testimony is the more credible because Herodotus made the journey not more than 150 or 160 years after the death of Psammetichus.
[22] De Bonald, _Théorie du Pouvoir_, i. 170.
[24] Mariette: _Aperçu de l’Histoire d’Egypte_, pp. 10 and 19.
[25] St. Paul says: “_Qui non laborat non manducet_.”
[29] From σείω, _I shake off_, and ἄχθος, _burden_. See Plutarch, _Life of Solon_, xiv.
[30] Ampère, _Des Castes, etc., dans l’ancienne Egypte_.
[31] Letter from M. de Rougé à M. Leemans, _Revue Archéol._, vol. xii.
[32] We have seen by the law respecting loans, attributed to King Bocchoris, that coined money was known to the Egyptians at least eight centuries B.C.
[33] F. Lenormant, _Manuel d’Hist. ancienne_.
[34] _Discours sur l’Hist. univ._: “The Egyptians observe the customs of their fathers, and adopt no new ones,” says Herodotus.
[35] _Théorie du Pouvoir_, vol. i. book 1. From this work, now consulted so little, but nevertheless full of remarkable views respecting the different systems of social organization, we have taken the plan of this _étude_ of the political institutions of ancient Egypt.
[37] _Notice du Musée de Boulaq_, p. 185.
[38] F. Lenormant, _Manuel d’Hist. anc._, vol. i. p. 334.
Most of our merchant readers will be able to recall a thousand pleasant reminiscences or anecdotes of the firm of Hawkins & Smith, wholesale cloth dealers, of our great metropolis. Mr. Hawkins is the dapper, fluent, old English gentleman, who meets all callers upon the house. He appears to be the very life of the firm, and sells the counters and shelves as clean as his own smoothly shaved, fair little face. He is fond of boasting that he never kept a piece of goods through two whole seasons. He is the only member of the firm with whom our agents and correspondents are acquainted. Rarely, indeed, does it enter anybody’s head to inquire for Mr. Smith. But a silent, squarely-built, gray-eyed man, never to be seen in the salesroom, and only in the office at the earliest hours, looks as if he might be called Smith, or any other practically-sounding name; and on closer inspection this same individual appears to possess those qualities which would fit one to do and endure the grinding, screwing, and pounding, the stern refusing and energetic demanding, connected with the business of such a distinguished firm. Smith never boasts. He has a disagreeable way of chuckling, when he observes, before dismissing an idle employee, that _he_ (Smith) came here (to New York) in his own schooner from home (Rhode Island) and, in six months, bought his share in the present business. Mr. Hawkins never alludes to him in conversation, but always greets him with marked respect, and, when late to business, with a nervous flush quite unpleasant to witness. It has been said by enemies of the firm that Hawkins is a first-class salesman because Smith does all the buying; and many quaint expressions have arisen regarding the fate of the American eagle whenever a certain coin passes between old Smith’s thumb and forefinger.