On November 7, the United Nations Security Council a resolution on Israel's month-long war with Hamas amid concerns about the rising death toll and growing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Some Council members, including the United States, insist on a humanitarian pause while other nations demand an immediate cease-fire.
Russia retains its position as a supporter of a cease-fire resolution but also denies Israel’s right to self-defense while accusing the United States and allies of “hypocrisy” for supporting Israel.
Russia’s U.N. ambassador, Vasily Nebenzya :
“I cannot leave unmentioned the hypocrisy of the U.S. and its allies. … All they can do is keep saying about Israel’s alleged right for self-defense, which, as an occupying state, it does not have, as was confirmed by the [U.N.] International Court consultative ruling in 2004.”
The claim is misleading.
The by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the U.N.’s principal judicial organ, does not concern the Gaza Strip or Israel's right to self-defense against Hamas. The ruling, which is consultative, disputes the legality of Israel's building of a wall that separates it from the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank.
The issue, which is decades-old, involves the route of a barrier built by Israel that differs from the U.N.-recognized Green Line, a demarcation established following the Arab-Israeli war of 1948-1949. After the Six-Day War of 1967, Israel established a new demarcation line that the an encroachment on occupied Palestinian territory in the West Bank.
The the wall violates international law, and that Israel is obliged to stop its construction immediately.
An ICJ Advisory Opinion Israel’s argument of self-defense, concluding that the right to self-defense does not grant the right to erect a barrier in a territory the U.N. recognizes as occupied.
“Israel cannot rely on a right of self-defense or on a state of necessity in order to preclude the wrongfulness of the construction of the wall. The Court accordingly finds that the construction of the wall and its associated regime are contrary to international law.”
Gaza Strip came under Israeli control on June 7, 1967, after the . In August–September 2005, as part of a unilateral disengagement plan, the Israeli government forced the evacuation of Israeli residents of Gaza — Israeli settlers — and from the strip.
Nevertheless, Israel, according to the — an agreement between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization — continued to control Gaza's territorial waters and airspace in order
The United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom, and other countries have designated .
Whether such Israeli control is a sign of occupation of the Gaza Strip remains a . Israel, the U.S., and a number of legal experts believe that Jerusalem has given up effective control of the Gaza Strip, thus ending the occupation. The U.N., the European Union, and several other international organizations consider the occupation ongoing.
This does not affect our verdict of Nebenzya's claim as misleading because the did not address the Gaza Strip.
The country's right to self-defense, according to Article 51 of the , can be limited only by U.N. Security Council measures:
“Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security.”
Israel's right to self-defense against terror attacks was acknowledged by most , , and .
The European Council condemned Hamas's aggression and under humanitarian and international law:
“We strongly emphasize Israel’s right to defend itself in line with humanitarian and international law in the face of such violent and indiscriminate attacks,” the European Council stated on October 15.
“Israel has not only the right but the obligation to defend itself [after the] Hamas terrorist organization” attack, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken on November 2, before visiting the Middle East.
is a fact-checking website produced by Voice of America (VOA). The website serves as a resource for verifying the increasing volume of disinformation and misinformation being distributed and shared globally.