[III-83] _Ixtlilxochitl_, in _Kingsborough's Mex. Antiq._, vol. ix., pp. 208-9, 217, 333, 335-7, 392-4, 450; _Veytia_, _Hist. Ant. Mej._, tom. i., pp. 25, 139, 231, 301-2, tom. ii., pp. 3-7; _Torquemada_, _Monarq. Ind._, tom. i., pp. 38-40. Brasseur, _Hist. Nat. Civ._, tom. i., pp. 125-6, thinks that Chalcatzin and Tlacamitzin were the successors of Xhunahpa left by Xbalanque in command of the Nahuas, and that they were defeated and exiled by the monarch of Xibalba. For details and further references respecting the Chichimec migration see a future chapter. The Chichimec kings were: Chichimecatl, Mixcohuatl, Huitzilopochtli, Huemac, Nauhyotl, Quauhtepetla, Nonohualca, Huetzin, Quauhtonal, Masatzin, Quetzal, Icoatzin, Mozeloquitzin, Tlamacatzin--in one place Nequametl and Namocuix are named instead of Chichimecatl. _Ixtlilxochitl_, p. 394; _Veytia_, tom. i., p. 231; _Carbajal Espinosa_, _Hist. Mex._, tom. i., pp. 225-6; _Müller_, _Reisen_, tom. iii., pp. 43-4.
[III-84] _Brasseur de Bourbourg_, _Hist. Nat. Civ._, tom. i., pp. 126, 179-80; _Id._, _Cartas_, pp. 31-4; _Id._, _Popol Vuh_, pp. clix-clxi. Brasseur gives a report of the ruins of a northern Tula in California, which of course is unfounded. He thinks the Opatas, Yaquis, Mayos, and Tarahumares are remnants of the old Toltec populations in this region. He does not attribute the ruins of the New Mexican and Arizona group to the Toltecs, at least not at this early period. Bradford also, _Amer. Antiq._, p. 202, speaks of the first age as diffusing population from the centre through the north, to return in a reflux of numerous tribes in the second age.
[III-85] _Mendieta_, _Hist. Ecles._, pp. 145-6; _Torquemada_, _Monarq. Ind._, tom. i., pp. 32-3; _Gomara_, _Conq. Mex._, fol. 299-300; _Prichard's Nat. Hist. Man_, vol. ii., p. 514; _Brasseur de Bourbourg_, _Popol Vuh_, pp. xxix.-xxx.
[III-86] _Descrip. Chiapas_, in _Soc. Mex. Geog., Boletin_, tom. iii., p. 344.
[III-89] For details and for subsequent Yucatan history, see a future chapter. My authorities for the preceding remarks are _Landa_, _Relacion_, pp. 28-50; _Lizana_, in _Id._, pp. 348-56; _Cogolludo_, _Hist. Yuc._, pp. 178-9, 192, 196-7; _Las Casas_, _Hist. Apologética_, MS., cap. 123; _Torquemada_, _Monarq. Ind._, tom. ii., p. 52; _Veytia_, _Hist. Ant. Mej._, tom. i., p. 237; _Herrera_, _Hist. Gen._, dec. iv., lib. x., cap. ii.; _Ternaux-Compans_, in _Nouvelles Annales des Voy._, 1843, tom. xcvii., pp. 31-6. _Perez_, in _Landa_, _Relacion_, pp. 420-3; _Id._, in _Stephens' Yucatan_, vol. ii., pp. 465-9; _Brasseur de Bourbourg_, _Hist. Nat. Civ._, tom. i., pp. 68, 76-80, 126-7; _Id._, _Popol Vuh_, pp. lxxix, clv.-vi.; _Id._, _Cartas_, p. 13; _Gallatin_, in _Amer. Ethno. Soc., Transact._, vol. i., pp. 171-3; _Orozco y Berra_, _Geografía_, p. 128.