[23] So the second person forms _cuebres_, _uebres_, _uefres_, and the third person forms _cuebre_, _uebre_, _uefre_; cf. cǫbron, ǫbri, etc.
[24] For a discussion of the date, see K. Nyrop, _Grammaire historique de la langue française_ (Copenhagen, 1899-1903), I, § 187.
[26] Spelled _drictus_: see Schuchardt, _Vokalismus des Vulgärlateins_, II, 422.
[27] The period of the fall of the intertonic vowel covers, in part, the period of the voicing of intervocalic surds (§ 65); sometimes the vowel fell too soon for the surd to be voiced, sometimes it did not. The relation of the fall of unstressed vowels to the development of intervocalic consonants, in French, has been examined by L. Clédat in the _Revue de philologie française_, in a series of articles beginning XVII, 122. Cf. P. Marchot, _Phon._, pp. 84-90.
[28] Cf. H. Wendel, _Die Entwicklung der Nachtonvokale aus dem Lateinischen ins Provenzalische_, 1906.
[30] The change of accent, in this verb and others, was due to the analogy of the first and fourth conjugations (cantęron, sentíron) and to the influence of the second person plural (dissętz).
[31] The feminine forms _cobéza_, _tebéza_, etc., show a change of accent.
[32] In most of the modern dialects (but not in Gascony and lower Languedoc) this a has become o: _rosa_ ＞ _roso_. But in the Limousin dialects and some others -as ＞ -a: _rosas_ ＞ _rosa_.
[33] The _tg_ in this word is probably due to the influence of _iutiar_ ＜ _jūdĭcāre_.
[34] The forms with _r_ may be due to dissimilation or to the influence of _clergue_.
[35] Alvernia is attested: cf. _Zs._, XXVI, 123. The usual form is _Arvernicum_.
[36] Compare, in English, the _c_ of _coo_ and the _k_ of _key_.
[37] Compare the old-fashioned pronunciation of words like _card_, _kind_.
[38] For final _-ci_, _-gi_ in plurals, see § 92, (2).
[39] Before this, _frīgĭdus_ had become frįgdus in Italy and Gaul.
[40] It is natural to suppose that the n, in falling, nasalized the vowel; but no trace of this nasality remains.
[41] _Fes_, _nut_, which quite supplanted the regular forms, perhaps show the influence of _res_, _mut_.
[42] By analogy of such double forms, n is sometimes added to a few words ending in a vowel: _fŭit_ ＞ _fo_ _fon_, _prō_ ＞ _pro_ _pron_.