Bloggers from Latin America have quickly reacted to the US Embassy Cables leaked by WikiLeaks. Cables from embassies in several Spanish-speaking Latin American countries, including Argentina, Paraguay, Venezuela and Honduras, have been released. Bloggers in the region are analyzing the cables and what they mean to their individual countries and to Latin America as a whole. Blogging about cables by country One of the first cables to make headlines documented Secretary of State Hilary Clinton inquiring about the mental state of Argentinean President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, how she handled stress, and how she worked alongside her husband, former President Nestor Kirchner, as the Argentinean blog Econoblog [es] reports. Another Latin American country that quickly made the news was Paraguay, in a cable that The Guardian headlined, “Washington worries that Paraguay harbours Iranian agents and Islamist Terrorist.” Paraguayan blogger Enrique Galeano reacted to the leak in his blog [es]: No es el espionaje lo que nos debe indignar sino nuestra indiferencia ante este atropello a nuestra frágil independencia […] Es hora de que nos movilicemos por nuestra verdadera independencia, es hora de que repudiemos en serio esta actitud, no solo de los Estados Unidos, con relación a nuestro país. Debemos exigir respeto, al menos mínimamente, a nuestra democracia y a nuestra independencia como país. It is not the spying that we should be mad about, but rather our indifference in facing this trampling of our fragile independence. […] It is time for us to mobilize for our true independence, it is time for us to really repudiate this attitude, not only from the United States, towards our country. We must demand respect, at least, towards our democracy and our independence as a country. Greg Weeks from Two Weeks Notice: A Latin American Politics Blog looks at what one of the leaked cables reveals about Honduras’ political crisis in June 2009, when Manuel Zelaya was removed from office: From Wikileaks, here is a July 24, 2009 cable from Ambassador Hugo Llorens in Honduras to Washington with an outline of the developing coup. I think it is a good analysis, looking at both sides and concluding without a doubt that Mel Zelaya's removal was both illegitimate and illegal. Daniel Duquenal from Venezuela News and Views writes, As expected, wikileaks is not going to be good news for Chavez. So far there is one cable that addresses Venezuela, at the very end of that cable. It is a French assistant to Sarkozy and he says earlier that Iran is a Fascist regime (Duh!) and that: ——————————– VENEZUELA ——————————– 13. (C) Levitte observed that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is “crazy” and said that even Brazil wasn't able to support him anymore. Unfortunately, Chavez is taking one of the richest countries in Latin America and turning it into another Zimbabwe. The leak includes cables that have not been released to the public yet, but bloggers like Juan Manuel Caicedo [es] from Colombia have started providing data on documents about their country: De los 2416 documentos de la Embajada de EE.UU. en Bogotá, 2373 (98%) se publicaron entre el 2004 y el 2010. […] Los documentos se refieren a 272 temas diferentes. Los 10 temas más frecuentes son asuntos internos, externos, terrorismo y derechos humanos. Out of the 2416 documents from the Embassy of the United States in Bogotá, 2373 (98%) were published between 2004 and 2010. […] The documents refer to 272 different subjects. The 10 most frequent are internal and external matters, terrorism, and human rights. Tim Johnson from Mexico Unmasked shares similar information on leaked documents about Mexico: The cables are likely to reveal much about U.S. cooperation with Mexico against narcotics traffickers, migration issues and relations with the current and past governments of the National Action Party (PAN). There may be assessments of key government officials. According to news accounts here in the capital, there are 2,285 cables from the Embassy, and the rest from consulates [.] The role of citizen media and the ethics behind WikiLeaks Javier Moreno in Rango Finito [es] breaks down his thoughts about the leak into 10 points. In his last point he talks about The New York Times and other traditional newspapers releasing the information, concluding that: […] parecería que es necesario que los medios independientes y pequeños y los ciudadanos tomen en sus manos el trabajo, que nadie más hará con seriedad, de explorar y visibilizar la información realmente relevante oculta entre la montaña de cables. In the Chilean blog de la República [es], Rodrigo F. echoes the need for online, independent media to analyze the material.