[24] Winsor, _Miss. Basin_, 633. Ogg, _Opening of Miss._, 301.
[25] Bouquet to Amherst, Dec. 1, 1763, Can. Arch., Ser. A, Vol. IV, p 413. Gage to Bouquet, Dec. 22, 1763, Ibid., Vol. 8, p. 341.
[26] Lt. Col. Robertson to Gage, March 8, 1764, Ban. Coll., Eng. & Am., 1764-1765, De Villers, _Les dernièrs Années de la Louisiana_, 180.
[29] Loftus to Gage, April 9, 1764, Ban. Coll., Eng. & Am., 1764-1765. Gage to Halifax, May 21, 1764, Ibid. Parkman, _Conspiracy of Pontiac_, 88, 283, 285. Kingsford, _Hist. of Can._, V, 69-74. Winsor, _Narr. and Crit. Hist. of Am._, VI, 701, 702, Gayarre, _Louisiana_, II, 102-103.
[30] Loftus to Gage, April 9, 1764, Ban. Coll., Eng. & Am., 1764-1765. De Villers, _Les dernières Années de la Louisiana_, 182-184.
[32] Robertson to Gage, Mar. 8, 1764, Ibid. "Account of what happened when the English attempted to take possession of Illinois by way of the Mississippi," from Paris documents, Can. Arch. Report, 1905, I, 407-411. Parkman, _Conspiracy of Pontiac_, II, 284, note 1, containing a letter from Gage thanking D' Abadie for his efforts in behalf of the English.
[33] Extract from the correspondence of D' Abadie with the French commandants, Jan., 1764. _Can. Arch. Report_, 1905, I, 471. Parkman, who made a careful study of the correspondence in the French archives, came to the conclusion that the French officials may be exonerated. Winsor holds a similar view in his _Mississippi Basin_, 452. See also Cayarre, _Louisiana_, II, 101. Kingford, in his _Hist, of Can._, V, 69-74, places no dependence in D' Abadie's statements. On the other hand he bases most of his argument upon a letter of Loftus which he quotes at length, but gives no hint as to its location, date, &c. It is evidently not the letter written to Gage, which is quoted above.
[34] Loftus to Gage, April 9th, 1764, Ban. Coll., Eng. & Am., 1764-1765.
[35] Gage to Halifax, April 14th, 1764, _N. Y. Col. Docs._, VII, 619.
[36] This has reference to those tribes along the Mississippi River who were in direct communication with Pontiac and the French. The great Cherokee and Chicksaw nations were favorable to the English.
[37] Gage to Bouquet, May 21, 1764, Can. Arch., Ser. A, Vol. 8, p 393. Gage to Halifax, May 2d, 1764, Ban. Coll., Eng. & Am., 1764-1765. Gage to Haldimand, May 27, 1764, Brit. Mus., Add. MSS, 21, 662. Gage to Halifax, July 13, 1764, Ban. Coll., Eng. & Am., 1764-1765.
