In this paper we solve in the negative the problem proposed in this journal (I. Montes et al., Sklar's theorem in an imprecise setting, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 278 (2015), 48-66) whether an order interval defined by an imprecise copula contains a copula. Namely, if $\mathcal{ C}$ is a nonempty set of copulas, then $\underline{ C} = \inf\{ C\}_{ C\in\mathcal{ C}}$ and $\overline{ C}= \sup\{ C\}_{ C\in\mathcal{ C}}$ are quasi-copulas and the pair $(\underline{ C},\overline{ C})$ is an imprecise copula according to the definition introduced in the cited paper, following the ideas of $p$-boxes. We show that there is an imprecise copula $(A,B)$ in this sense such that there is no copula $C$ whatsoever satisfying $A \leqslant C\leqslant B$. So, it is questionable whether the proposed definition of the imprecise copula is in accordance with the intentions of the initiators. Our methods may be of independent interest: We upgrade the ideas of Dibala et al. (Defects and transformations of quasi-copulas, Kybernetika, 52 (2016), 848-865) where possibly negative volumes of quasi-copulas as defects from being copulas were studied.
Categories: math.PR