Subsequently again a male and female spider, evidently of one species, were figured by Dugès to illustrate _N. cæmentaria_ male and female in Cuvier's _Règne Animal_--Edition in 20 vols. not numbered and without date, published in Paris, "_accompagnée de Planches par une réunion de disciples de Cuvier, MM. Audouin, Blanchard, Deshayes, Aleide d'Orbigny, Doyère, Dugès, Duvernoy, Laurillard, Milne Edwards, Roulin, et Valenciennes_." Of these figures, that of the male has the point of the palpal organs distinctly bifid, and the nest figured is of the cork-lid type.
On the whole it may be concluded that the male of the true _N. cæmentaria_, Latr., will be found to have the bifid point to the palpal organs, but the question cannot be considered settled until further researches at Montpellier and Aix (in Provence) shall have furnished _males_ of the _N. cæmentaria_ now described, and _females_ of the bifid pointed male--_N. carminans_, Latr.--for of course it is possible that Latreille's _first_ views of the distinctness of _cæmentaria_ and _carminans_ may be the correct ones.
The characters of the species now described accord so well with the figures of the female in Dugès' plate (above mentioned) that little doubt can be entertained of _their_ identity, and if so there would seem to be little doubt also, but that further research at Montpellier will reveal a male similar to the male figured by Dugès.
_Syn. Nemesia Eleanora_, Cambr., male and female, in _Harvesting Ants and Trap-door Spiders_, by J. T. Moggridge, p. 180, Pl. XII. and woodcuts, p. 109.
_Nemesia Alpigrada_ (Simon) male, _Aranéides nouv. ou peu connus du Midi de l'Europe_, 2^e Mémoire. Liège, 1873, 2^e sér. t. v. p. 27 (separate copy.).
There is but little to add to the descriptions given (l.c. _supra_). It must however be noted that the spines on the outer side of the genual joints of the third pair of legs, then supposed to be a characteristic of the present species only, are now found to exist in several others, with some small exceptions in regard to number, and also in respect to strict uniformity, on both legs of the same individual. In _N. cæmentaria_ (p. 264), however, there is rarely found even a single spine on either of these joints; and not one out of ten examples of another species, _N. Simoni_ (p. 297), had even one of these spines.
