Henry said he had thought at one time that if one only knew the truth, it was not necessary to be a good orator; one had simply to state the truth. But now he believed the form an essential part of the thought.
Marian said something of the artistic life as meaning one must have a single aim. I answered her it might be so, but the single aim would be immense and inclusive. Now we went on to the second law, which we formulated thus:
2. Art is self-expression and self-fulfilment.
Self-expression means action, creation. “Thinking, writing, the work of the artist is action,” I said. They understood. I quoted: “There is only one gift worth giving, and that is one’s self.” “To give one’s self,” I said, “that is action, that is life, creation and fulfilment.”
“Because it is always fulfilment to do the thing we love to do. Now what comes next?”
Henry said: “To leave out the distracting; to leave out detail.”
“Not necessarily detail,” I answered; “certain definite details are essential.”
They said to leave out the irrelevant, the inharmonious, the unnecessary. I said:
“Can you see,” I asked, “how that will apply to life?”
That is, contrast, rhythm, the all-roundness which makes the whole.
We had just begun to speak of the next law when I was called from the room.
As I returned, Henry said to me: “Well, then, let us write down: ‘must not be for or against.’”
So they had formulated it while I was away. I answered: “Rather let us use the word ‘partisan,’ which means part, not whole.”
5. Must not be partisan, and must be sympathetic.
I did not linger on this point, and was glad the children accepted it without question, for I wanted more time to explain it.
I went on to the last law, which was the only one I had some trouble in making clear. I asked why was the photograph inartistic? They said because of inharmonious details. I asked, why is the statue more beautiful than wax works? Henry spoke again of the “distance” of material, which just thereby appealed to the sympathies. I wanted to speak of the artist’s aloofness, how he was creator of his work, within it, and yet around it and above it. They did not understand. They said, if he were above it, he would be unsympathetic. They did not understand the creator’s attitude toward himself, the created; the dramatic attitude in life, in which we are both actor and spectator. Marian said she thought she understood it. “Haven’t you ever laughed at yourself?” she asked the others.