.—The Letter of the Synod, relative to its Decisions: and the Condemnation of Arius and those who agreed with him.

the holy, by the grace of

God, and great church of the Alexandrians, and to our beloved brethren

throughout Egypt, Libya, and Pentapolis, the bishops assembled at

Nicæa, constituting the great and holy Synod, send greeting in the

Lord.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume II/Socrates/Book I/Chapter 9

Since, by the grace of God, a great and holy Synod has

been convened at Nicæa, our most pious sovereign Constantine

having summoned us out of various cities and provinces for that

purpose, it appeared to us indispensably necessary that a letter should

be written to you on the part of the sacred Synod; in order that ye may

know what subjects were brought under consideration and examined, and

what was eventually determined on and decreed.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume II/Socrates/Book I/Chapter 9

In the first place, then, the impiety and guilt of Arius

and his adherents were examined into, in the presence of our most

religious emperor Constantine: and it was unanimously decided that his

impious opinion should be anathematized, with all the blasphemous

expressions he has uttered, in affirming that ‘the Son of God

sprang from nothing,’ and that ‘there was a time when he

was not’; saying moreover that ‘the Son of God, because

possessed of free will, was capable either of vice or virtue; and

calling him a creature and a work. All these sentiments the holy Synod

has anathematized, having scarcely patience to endure the hearing of

such an impious opinion, or, rather, madness, and such blasphemous

words. But the conclusion of our proceedings against him you must

either have been informed of already or will soon learn; for we would

not seem to trample on a man who has received the chastisement which

his crime deserved. Yet so contagious has his pestilential error

proved, as to drag into perdition Theonas, bishop of Marmarica, and

Secundus of Ptolemaïs; for they have suffered the same

condemnation as himself. But when the grace of God delivered us from

those execrable dogmas, with all their impiety and blasphemy, and from

those persons, who had dared to cause discord and division among a

people previously at peace, there still remained the contumacy of

Melitius [to be dealt with] and those who had been ordained by him; and

we now state to you, beloved brethren, what resolution the Synod came

to on this point. It was decreed, the Synod being moved to great

clemency towards Melitius, although strictly speaking he was wholly

undeserving of favor, that he remain in his own city but exercise no

authority either to ordain or nominate for ordination; and that he

appear in no other district or city on this pretense, but simply retain

a nominal dignity. That those who had received appointments from him, after having been confirmed by a more legitimate ordination, should be admitted to communion on these conditions: that they should continue to hold their rank and ministry, but regard themselves as inferior in every respect to all those who have been ordained and established in each place and church by our most-honored fellow-minister, Alexander, so that they shall have no authority to propose or nominate whom they please, or to do anything at all without the concurrence of some bishop of the Catholic Church who is one of Alexander’s suffragans. On the other hand, such as by the grace of God and your prayers have been found in no schism, but have continued in the Catholic Church blameless, shall have authority to nominate and ordain those who are worthy of the sacred office,

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume II/Socrates/Book I/Chapter 9