These different considerations render probable the opinion that I have entertained for some time, that the great sympathetic nerve does not really exist, that this cord is but a succession of communications between little nervous systems placed above each other, and that it is not essential that these communications should exist, as is seen constantly between the ophthalmic ganglion and the spheno-palatine, between that and the superior cervical, of which many animals furnish examples. Then I began to regard each ganglion as a separate centre of a little nervous system, wholly different from the cerebral, and distinct even from the little nervous systems of the other ganglions. By considering the functions of the nerves going from these centres, I became more and more convinced that they did not belong to the cerebral system. In fact, these nerves have properties very different from theirs, as we shall see; they do not serve for sensations; they have uniformly no connexion with voluntary locomotion; we see them only in the organs of internal life; hence why they are found concentrated in the trunk, in the thorax and abdomen particularly; why they are not met with in the head, where almost all the organs belong to animal life; why they are not seen in the extremities, which are exclusively dependant upon this life.
Distributed almost every where to the organs of the internal life, the ganglions and their nerves derive their character from it; and this is it. 1st. They are not symmetrical; thus the nerves of all the plexuses of the abdomen, those of the cardiacs, &c. have a remarkable irregularity. 2d. There are numberless varieties in the form of these plexuses and in that of the ganglions; it is thus that, sometimes lenticular, sometimes triangular, sometimes divided into many portions, that which is under the diaphragm is never seen twice alike. Hence the error of every name derived from the figure; a remark that is applicable generally to the organs of internal life. We might rather borrow the names of forms for animal life in which these forms are more invariable. On the other hand, the existence of many ganglions varies; sometimes there are three of them in the neck, at others but two. The arrangement of one side does not produce a similar one on the other. I have frequently remarked that the number of filaments arising from the superior cervical ganglion differs very much from those that take their origin from the opposite side. There are two analogous organs at each side; but several attributes of structure destroy the general character of symmetry; it is like the lungs and the kidnies. We can, then, establish as a distinctive character between the two nervous systems, the symmetry of one and the irregularity of the other; now, this character is one of those which distinguish the two lives, as I have remarked before.