E-text prepared by deaurider, Paul Marshall, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net) from page images generously made available by Internet Archive (https://archive.org)
Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this file which includes the original illustrations. See 53646-h.htm or 53646-h.zip: (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/53646/53646-h/53646-h.htm) or (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/53646/53646-h.zip)
Images of the original pages are available through Internet Archive. See https://archive.org/details/AnthropologyAndTheClassics
Text enclosed by underscores is in italics (_italics_).
Text enclosed by equal signs is in bold face (=bold=).
A carat character is used to denote superscription. A single character following the carat is superscripted (example: ^2).
Small capitals have been converted to ALL CAPITALS.
Six Lectures Delivered Before the University of Oxford
ARTHUR J. EVANS ANDREW LANG GILBERT MURRAY F. B. JEVONS J. L. MYRES W. WARDE FOWLER
Secretary to the Committee for Anthropology
Henry Frowde, M.A. Publisher to the University of Oxford London, Edinburgh, New York Toronto and Melbourne
Anthropology and the Humanities--on verbal grounds one might suppose them coextensive; yet in practice they divide the domain of human culture between them. The types of human culture are, in fact, reducible to two, a simpler and a more complex, or, as we are wont to say (valuing our own achievements, I doubt not, rightly), a lower and a higher. By established convention Anthropology occupies itself solely with culture of the simpler or lower kind. The Humanities, on the other hand--those humanizing studies that, for us at all events, have their parent source in the literatures of Greece and Rome--concentrate on whatever is most constitutive and characteristic of the higher life of society.
What, then, of phenomena of transition? Are they to be suffered to form a no-man’s-land, a buffer-tract left purposely undeveloped, lest, forsooth, the associates of barbarism should fall foul of the friends of civilization? Plainly, in the cause of science, a pacific penetration must be tolerated, nay, encouraged, from both sides at once. Anthropology must cast forwards, the Humanities cast back. And there is not the slightest reason (unless prejudice be accounted reason) why conflict should arise between the interests thus led to intermingle.