Chapter IV.—Some

Things Here Hard and Too Slightly Treated, and Apparently Not

Sufficiently Brought Out According to the Rule of Theology.

Such, then, I consider to be the objections urged

by many who, despising, as it seems, the wisdom of Paul, dislike the

comparing of the first man to Christ. For come, let us consider

how rightly Paul compared Adam to Christ, not only considering him to

be the type and image, but also that Christ Himself became the very

same thing, because the

Eternal Word fell upon Him. For it was fitting that the

first-born of God, the first shoot, the only-begotten, even the wisdom

of God, should be joined to the first-formed man, and first and

first-born of mankind, and should become incarnate. And this was

Christ, a man filled with the pure and perfect Godhead, and God

received into man. For it was most suitable that the oldest of

the Æons and the first of the Archangels, when about to hold

communion with men, should dwell in the oldest and the first of men, even Adam. And thus, when renovating those things which were from the beginning, and forming them again of the Virgin by the Spirit, He frames the same just as at the beginning. When the earth was still virgin and untilled, God, taking mould, formed the reasonable creature from it without seed.

Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VI/Methodius/Banquet of the Ten Virgins/Thaleia/Part 4

Footnotes

Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VI/Methodius/Banquet of the Ten Virgins/Thaleia/Part 4