Canon CXXXIII. (Greek cxxxiv.)

That a bishop should not rashly deprive anyone of

communion.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/Additional Canons 3/The Canons of Carthage/Canons/Canon CXXXIII

long as his own bishop will

not communicate with one excommunicated, the other bishops should have

no communion with that bishop, that the bishop may be more careful not

to charge anyone with what he cannot prove by documentary evidence to

others.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/Additional Canons 3/The Canons of Carthage/Canons/Canon CXXXIII

(Greek cxxxv.)

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/Additional Canons 3/The Canons of Carthage/Canons/Canon CXXXIII

said:  According to the statutes of this

whole assembled council, and the opinion of my littleness, it seems

good to make an end of all the matters of the whole of the

before-manifested title, and let the ecclesiastical acts receive the

discussion of the present day’s constitution.

And what things have

not yet been expressed (“treated of” in the Greek) we shall

write on the next day through our brethren, Bishop Faustinus and the

Presbyters Philip and Asellus to our venerable brother and

fellow-bishop Boniface; and they gave their assent in writing.

Notes.

If a bishop deprives of communion an unconvicted man, he

shall likewise be deprived of communion with his fellows.

.

Never was a more impartial law made, especially when all

the legislators were bishops except two. There were 217 bishops, and two priests, being legates from the bishop of Rome.

The Greeks make a canon of the ratifications, and reckon

no more than 135. Aurelius, Bishop of Carthage, subscribes first, and after him 217 bishops, then Asellus and Philippus, priests, legates of the church of Rome. And it does not appear that any other priests were present in any of the councils, mentioned in the body of this code; but there is several times notice taken of the deacons who stood by.