14. I wrote these words beforehand as a statement of my faith, when as yet none of these calumniators had arisen, so that it should be in no man’s power to say that it was merely because of their admonition or their compulsion that I said things which I had not believed before. Moreover, I promised that, whatever the requirements of translation might be, I would, while complying with them, maintain the principles of my faith inviolate. How then can any room be left for evil, when the very first word of my confession preserves and defends me from the suspicion of holding any doctrine inconsistent with it? Besides, as I have said above. I have learned from the words of the Lord that every one shall be justified or condemned from his own words and not from those of others.

But I will show how, in the

Preface which I prefixed to the

books Περὶ

᾽Αρχῶν, I

declared what was to be the regulative principle of my translation, and

will prove it, as in the former case, by quoting the words themselves: for it is right to quote from this document also whatever is pertinent to the matter in hand. I had made honourable mention of the man who now turns my praise of him into all accusation against me, for his services in having led the way and having translated a great many works of Origen before I had begun: I had praised both his eloquence as an expositor and his diligence as a translator, and had said that I took him as my model in doing a similar work. And then, after a few more sentences, I continued thus:

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Rufinus/Apology of Rufinus/Book I/Chapter 14

‘Him therefore we take as

our model so far as in us lies, not indeed in the power of his

eloquence, but in his method of doing his work, taking care not to

reproduce things which are found in the books of Origen discrepant and

contrary to his own true opinion.’

I beg the reader to observe what

I have said, and not to let this sentence escape him because of its

brevity. What I said was that ‘I would not reproduce the things

which are found in the books of Origen discrepant and contrary to his

own true opinion.’ I did not make a general promise that I would

not reproduce what was contrary to the faith, nor yet what was contrary

to me or to some one else, but what was contrary to or discrepant from

Origen himself. My opponents must not be allowed to propagate a false

statement against me by snatching at a part of this sentence and saying

that I had promised not to reproduce anything which was contrary to or

discrepant from my own belief. If I had been capable of such conduct, I

certainly should not have dared to make a public profession of it. If

you find that this has been done in my work, you will know how to judge

of it. But if you find that it has not been done, you will not think

that I am to blame, since I never gave you any pledge which would bind

me to do it.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Rufinus/Apology of Rufinus/Book I/Chapter 14

Footnotes

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Rufinus/Apology of Rufinus/Book I/Chapter 14