[Illustration: Fig. 10.—Arrangement of a microscopic aquarium for examining _infusoria_.]
[Illustration: Fig. 11.—Flight of butterflies seen near Berne, June 15th, 1879.]
[Illustration: Fig. 12.—Group of rock crystal.]
We cannot point out too strongly to our readers that the essential condition for the student of natural science, is the possession of that sacred fire which imparts the energy and perseverance necessary for acquiring and enlarging collections. It is also necessary that the investigator should furnish himself with certain indispensable tools. For collecting plants, the botanist should be armed with a pickaxe set in a thoroughly strong handle, a trowel, of which there is a variety of shapes, and a knife with a sharp blade. A botanical case must also be included, for carrying the plants. The geologist, or mineralogist, needs no more elaborate instruments; a hammer, a chisel, and a pickaxe with a sharp point for breaking the rocks, and a bag for carrying the specimens, will complete his outfit. We amused ourselves by having these instruments made by the blacksmith, sometimes even by manufacturing them ourselves; they were simple, but solid, and admirably adapted to the requirements of research. Often we directed our walks to the seashore, where we liked to collect shells on the sandy beach, or fossils among the cliffs and rocks. I recollect, in a walk I had taken some years previously along the foot of the cliffs of Cape Blanc-Nez, near Calais, having found an impression of an ammonite of remarkable size, which has often excited the admiration of amateurs; this ammonite measured no less than twelve inches in diameter. The rocks of Cape Grisnez, not far from Boulogne, also afford the geologian the opportunity of a number of curious investigations. In the Ardennes and the Alps I have frequently procured some fine mineral specimens; in the first locality crystallized pyrites, in the second, fine fragments of rock crystal (fig. 12). I did not fail to recount these successful expeditions to the young people who accompanied me, and their ardour was thereby inflamed by the hope that they also should find something valuable. It often happened when the sun was powerful, and the air extremely calm, that my young companions and I remarked some very beautiful effects of mirage on the beach, due to the heating of the lower _strata_ of the atmosphere. The trees and houses appeared to be raised above a sheet of silver, in which their reflections were visible as in a sheet of tranquil water. It can hardly be believed how frequently the atmosphere affords interesting spectacles which pass unperceived before the eyes of those who know not how to observe. I recollect having once beheld at Jersey a magnificent phenomenon of this nature, on the 24th June, 1877, at eight o’clock in the evening: it was a column of light which rose above the sinking sun like a sheaf of fire. I was walking on the St. Helier pier, where there were also many promenaders, but there were not more than two or three who regarded with me this mighty spectacle. Columns and crosses of light are much more frequent than is commonly supposed, but they often pass unperceived before indifferent spectators. We will describe an example of this phenomenon observed at Havre on the 7th May, 1877. The sun formed the centre of the cross, which was of a yellow, golden colour. This cross had four branches. The upper branch was much more brilliant than the others; its height was about 15°. The lower branch was smaller, as seen in the sketch on page 2, taken from nature by Monsieur Albert Tissandier. The two horizontal branches were at times scarcely visible, and merged in a streak of reddish-yellow colour, which covered a large part of the horizon. A mass of cloud, which the setting sun tinged with a deep violet colour, formed the foreground of the picture. The atmosphere over the sea was very foggy. The phenomenon did not last more than a quarter of an hour, but the conclusion of the spectacle was signalized by an interesting circumstance. The two horizontal branches, and the lower branch of the luminous cross, completely disappeared, whilst the upper branch remained alone for some minutes longer. It had now the appearance of a _vertical column_ rising from the sun, like that which Cassini studied on the 21st May, 1672, and that which M. Renon[5] and M. A. Guillemin observed on the 12th July, 1876.[6] Vertical columns, which, it is well known, are extremely rare phenomena, may therefore indicate the existence of a luminous cross, which certain atmospheric conditions have rendered but partially visible.