Reverent hands carried the body to the house, and later it was examined by a skilled physician from New York City.
He reported that death had ensued upon the girl's arm being scratched with some sharp implement, which had been previously dipped in a powerful poison.
As this was the same physician who had passed the final judgment on the cause of Mr. Bruce's death, his report was listened to with confidence and belief.
"You must know," he said, to the awed group, "that about last March, a plot was formed against some high officials in England. These diabolical plans included the use of extremely poisonous drugs. By a most culpable oversight the names and descriptions of these poisons crept into the public press, and since then, several attempts at their use have been made, mostly, I am glad to say, without result.
"But, it is clear to me, that the murderer of these two people, Mr. Bruce, and the child, Vernie Reid, used the poisons I have told you of."
"I read about them," said Pennington Wise. "They included a rare drug only to be obtained from South America."
"That was the statement," said the doctor, "but I'm credibly informed there is a supply secretly hoarded in this country. However that may be, I am convinced that was the means used in Miss Reid's case. This poison must be introduced under the skin, by means of a cut or scratch, whereupon, the effect is instantaneously fatal. Twenty seconds is said to be the extreme length of time for life to remain in a body after the introduction of the venom. There is a distinct scratch on Miss Reid's upper right arm, so inflamed and poisoned as to leave no doubt in the matter."
"That's why the body was removed," said the Professor, "lest that scratch be discovered."
"Yes," agreed Wise, "and the other victim, Mr. Bruce, was killed by having the poison introduced into his stomach."
"That was a different poison," said the doctor. "That was strychnine hydrochlorate, which acts with equal speed. The evidential point is, that these two poisons were both plotted to be used in the case I mentioned in England, which, however, was foiled before it was actually attempted. The grave wrong, was the account in the newspapers, which was so circumstantial and definite as to give information to whoever cared to use it. Can any one doubt that the villain in this case, read the article I speak of, which was in several of our American papers, and made use of his ill-gotten directions to achieve his purpose?"