Field Inspection. Weehawken. Chief Inspector. Inspector, N. Tunnel ” S. Tunnel. ” Mixer. ” Excavation and Force Account. Inspector, Night. Cement Warehouseman. Conduit Inspector. (_one position_) Hackensack. Chief Inspector. Chief Inspector. Inspector, N. Tunnel ” S. Tunnel. ” Mixer. ” Excavation and Force Account. Inspector, Night. Cement Warehouseman. Conduit Inspector. (_one position_)
Alignment. Weehawken. Chief of Party. Instrumentman. Rodman. Chainman. Hackensack. Chief of Party. Instrumentman. Rodman. Chainman.]
Organization After the Tunnels Had Been Holed Through.
Resident Engineer. ________________|_______________ | | | | Assistant | | Assistant Engineer. | | Engineer. _______|______ | | | | | | | | Cost and Office Field Inspection. | Alignment. Records. _____|_____________| | | Tunnels. Conduit Inspector.
Cost and Office Records. Two Inspectors. Two Clerks. Stenographer. Telephone Operator. Messenger. Janitor.
Tunnels. Chief Inspector. 8 Tunnel Inspectors. 2 Mixer Inspectors. 1 Night Inspector. Conduit Inspector. Inspector, Hackensack Approach.
Alignment. 1 Instrumentman. 1 Draftsman. 2 Rodmen. 3 Chainmen.]
The general organization of the staff is shown by the two diagrams, Figs. 20 and 21. Fig. 20 shows the organization previous to the holing through of the tunnels, during which time a separate office was maintained at the western end for the use of the men stationed there; Fig. 21 shows the organization during the latter part of the time, after the tunnels were holed through. The Assistant Engineer in charge of the construction was J. R. Taft, Assoc. M. Am. Soc. C. E.; the Chief Inspector, J. S. Frazer, Jun. Am. Soc. C. E., had charge of about 75% of the work of the lining of the tunnels. The alignment has been from the beginning under the charge of R. L. Reynolds, Assistant Engineer.
Each Plate was printed with the same header: PLATE __. TRANS. AM. SOC. CIV. ENGRS. VOL. LXVIII, No. 1154. LAVIS ON PENNSYLVANIA R.R. TUNNELS: BERGEN HILL TUNNELS. These headers were omitted for the e-text. Captions beginning in “K” with a number were printed directly on the photograph; some readings are uncertain and are indicated by question marks (?).
In the tables of Figures 1-4, variation between “to” and “-”, and formatting of table entries, is as in the original.