[157] PAGE 67, LINE 21. Page 67, line 22. _aëris rigore._--All editions read thus, but the sense seems to require _frigore_.

[158] PAGE 67, LINE 27. Page 67, line 31. _Fracastorius._--See his _De Sympathia_, lib. i., cap. 5 (Giunta edition, 1574, p. 60).

On the magnet, magnetick bodies also, and on the great magnet the earth — Part 184

[159] PAGE 68, LINE 5. Page 68, line 6. _Thaletis Milesij._--See the note to p. 11, line 26.

On the magnet, magnetick bodies also, and on the great magnet the earth — Part 184

[160] PAGE 68, LINE 30. Page 68, line 35. _Ità coitio magnetica actus est magnetis, & ferri, non actio vnius._--See the introductory remarks to these notes. There is a passage in Scaliger's _De Subtilitate ad Cardanum_ (Exercitat. CII., cap. 5, p. 156 _op. citat._) which may be compared with Gilbert's for its use of Greek terms: "Nã cùm uita dicatur actus animæ, acceptus est abs te actus pro actione. Sed actus ille est [Greek: entelecheia], nõ autem [Greek: ergon]. At Magnetis attractio est [Greek: ergon], non aut[~e] [Greek: entelecheia]." To which Gilbert retorts: "non actio unius, utriusque [Greek: entelecheia]; non [Greek: ergon], [Greek: sunentelecheia] et conactus potius quam sympathia." He returns on p. 70 to the attack on Scaliger's metaphysical notions. There is a parallel passage in the _Epitome Naturalis Scientiæ_ of Daniel Sennert (Oxoniæ, 1664), in the chapter _De Motu_.

On the magnet, magnetick bodies also, and on the great magnet the earth — Part 184

[161] PAGE 71, LINE 4. Page 71, line 8. _vt in 8. physicorum Themistius existimat._--See _Omnia Themistii Opera_ (Aldine edition, 1533, p. 63), Book 8 of his Paraphrase on Aristotle's _Physica_.

[162] PAGE 71, LINE 9. Page 71, line 14. _Quod verò Fracastorius._--_Op. citat._, lib. i., cap. 7, p. 62 _verso_.

[163] PAGE 73, LINE 2. Page 73, line 2. _si A borealis._--The editions of 1628 and 1633 omit the twelve words next following.

[164] PAGE 73, LINE 9. Page 73, line 11. _ex minera._--_Minera_ is not a recognized word, even in late Latin. It occurs again, p. 97, line 12.

[165] PAGE 77, LINE 2. Page 77, line 2. _multo magis._--This is an _à fortiori_ argument. It is interesting to find Gilbert comparing the velocity of propagation of magnetic forces in space with the velocity of light. The parallel is completed in line 13 by the consideration that as the rays of light require to fall upon an object in order that they may become visible, so the magnetic forces require a magnetic object in order to render their presence sensible.