United States v. Solon, 596 F.3d 1206 (10th Cir. 2010), was a case in which Nathaniel Solon, a resident of Casper, Wyoming, was convicted for possession of child pornography. The case became known in the media for irregularities in the process, and suspicions (affirmed by the defendant) that the material was introduced by malware on the computer. There were other people accused of similar crimes, who were later acquitted, but Solon was never exonerated.

Background

Nathaniel Solon was charged on January 18, 2007, by the indictment with possessing child pornography. On October 2, 2007, he pleaded guilty. When he came back for another hearing on January 8, 2008, however, Solon stated that he was an innocent man, and the only reason that he had pleaded guilty in the first place was because he believed that he did not have the financial resources to hire an expert witness to investigate his defense. In regard to his explanation, the court appointed him a private attorney to represent him. With the court's approval, Solon was able to request an expert witness, with an investigation budget of $20,000 supplied by the court.

United States v. Solon

See also

Frameup

References

External links

Framed for Child Porn, a website collecting similar cases, inspired on this case.

United States v. Solon

American people convicted of child pornography offenses

United States computer case law

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit cases

United States due process case law

United States Internet case law

2010 in United States case law

Child pornography law

Casper, Wyoming

Malware

United States v. Solon