E-text prepared by MWS, RichardW, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net) from page images generously made available by Internet Archive (https://archive.org)
Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this file which includes the original illustrations. See 59215-h.htm or 59215-h.zip: (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/59215/59215-h/59215-h.htm) or (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/59215/59215-h.zip)
Images of the original pages are available through Internet Archive. See https://archive.org/details/rulesfordictiona00cuttuoft
Text enclosed by underscores is in italics (_italics_).
Text enclosed by angle quotation marks is in bold face («bold»).
A caret character is used to denote superscription. A single character following the caret is superscripted (example: 51^3). Multiple superscripted characters are enclosed by curly brackets (example: Hon^{ ble}).
Original small capitals are now uppercase.
Original printed page numbers are shown enclosed by curly brackets (example: { 52}).
Footnotes and other anchored notes have been relabeled 1–73, and moved from within paragraphs to nearby locations between paragraphs. In this text edition, each note is by [note] . . . [/note].
U. S. Bureau Of Education Special Report On Public Libraries—Part II
Third Edition With Corrections and Additions and an Alphabetical Index
Washington Government Printing Office 1891
Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1875, by Charles A. Cutter, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.
There are plenty of treatises on classification, of which accounts may be found in Edwards’s Memoirs of Libraries and Petzholdt’s Bibliotheca Bibliographica. The classification of the St. Louis Public School Library Catalogue is briefly defended by W. T. Harris in the preface (which is reprinted, with some additions, from the Journal of Speculative Philosophy for 1870). Professor Abbot’s plan is explained in a pamphlet printed and in use at Harvard College Library, also in his “Statement respecting the New Catalogue” (part of the report of the examining committee of the library for 1863), and in the North American Review for January, 1869. The plan of Mr. Schwartz, librarian of the Apprentices’ Library, New York, is partially set forth in the preface to his catalogue; and a fuller explanation is preparing for publication. For an author-catalogue there are the famous 91 rules of the British Museum[1] (prefixed to the Catalogue of Printed Books, Vol. 1, 1841, or conveniently arranged in alphabetical order by Th. Nichols in his Handbook for Readers at the British Museum, 1866); Professor Jewett’s modification of them (Smithsonian Report on the Construction of Catalogues, 1852); Mr. F. B. Perkins’s further modification (in the American Publisher for 1869), and a chapter in the second volume of Edwards.[2] But for a dictionary-catalogue as a whole, and for most of its parts, there is no manual whatever. Nor have any of the above-mentioned works attempted to set forth the rules in a systematic way or to investigate what might be called the first principles of cataloguing. It is to be expected that a first attempt will be incomplete, and I shall be obliged to librarians for criticisms, objections, or new problems, with or without solutions. { 4} With such assistance perhaps a second edition of these hints would deserve the title—Rules.[3]