“Halfe in dede sclepe, not fully revyved;”

“For on this wyse upon a night As ye have herd withouten light, Not all wakyng ne full on slepe, About such hour as lovirs wepe;”

The Philosophy of Mystery — Part 138

and in “La Belle Dame sans Mercy,” there is the same thought:

The Philosophy of Mystery — Part 138

“Halfe in a dreme, not fully well awaked;”

The Philosophy of Mystery — Part 138

and in Sir Walter’s “Antiquary:” “Eh, sirs, sic weary dreams as folk hae between sleeping and waking, before they win to the long sleep and the sound.” So will your philosophy dwindle somewhat in its consequence, Sir Clerke.

EV. We are not jealous of these _glimpses_ of a poet, Castaly; they impart a value to their rhymes: we enrol _such_ poets in the rank of philosophers.

IDA. Solve me this question, Evelyn: is there any relative difference between the subjects of dreams _before_ and _after_ sleep?

EV. It has been thought that there is more reference to reality in the _first_, and more confusion and wandering of imagination in the _second_; but as nature is often _excited_ rather than exhausted at night, there may be equal brightness with the morning dream, occurring after the recreation and refreshment of sleep.

CAST. We may concede, then, some wisdom to the Sybarites, who destroyed their morning heralds, the cocks, that they might enjoy their matin dreams undisturbed. And I remember one of Pope’s allusions to the virtues of this _υπαρ_, or morning dream:

“What time the morn mysterious visions brings, While purer slumbers spread their golden wings.”

ASTR. We have often discoursed on the psychology of Locke, Evelyn, and we are now involved in one of its most interesting points—_innate idea_. Is the dreamer _conscious_ of his dream? It has been asserted, especially by two profound metaphysicians, Beattie and Reid, that they _persuaded_ themselves in their dreams that they _were_ dreaming, and would then attempt to throw themselves off a precipice; this awoke them, and proved the impression a fiction. Were there not present in this, volition and consciousness; and is it not an evidence of an innate idea without sensation?

EV. No. A train of thought and passive memory may take place without volition, even in a waking mind; a train of _reasoning_ cannot. So feeling and _passive_ thought may in the mere dream, but not a _conscious acting_ on it. The phenomena, and the expressions used to describe these impressions, are precisely illustrative of another condition of sleep, to which we have not yet pointed. This notion of Beattie was but an echo of Aristotle. The Stagyrite himself was subject to dreams of danger, and, after a while, he used to whisper to himself: “Don’t be frightened,—this is only a dream:” the glaring proof that it was _not_; and yet psychologists still talk of the _management_ of a dream.