"BAMBOO," the other _Raw Material_ to which I have alluded, can hardly be called "_New_," it being well known that both the Chinese and Japanese have from time immemorial employed "Bamboo" for Paper-making purposes; and I have shown in the preceding "Remarks" that attempts have more recently been made, not hitherto affording successful commercial results.

It therefore would have been more correct had I, in directing attention to "BAMBOO," described it as an "_Old material_" under "_New treatment_." Such indeed was the case with "ESPARTO," an "_Old material_," well known, and tried ineffectually by many, previous to my process for converting it into paper being adopted, which, however, did not take place until it had been fully tested and approved, leading then to its speedy employment.

Bamboo, Considered as a Paper-making Material — Part 20

I believe with my new system of treatment "BAMBOO" will prove to be as superior to "Esparto," in every respect as "Esparto" was found to be superior to "Straw," the only other "_raw material_" used when it was introduced.

Bamboo, Considered as a Paper-making Material — Part 20

"BAMBOO" differs from "MEGASSE," inasmuch as the latter is produced, as it were, involuntarily, its maximum value as a "_raw product_" being determined by its comparison with fuel; whereas "BAMBOO" would have to be cultivated; but, as this plant will not only grow, but flourish, in localities unsuitable for other cultivation, and is produced with such extraordinary rapidity and abundance, it would appear that, as a _Raw Product_, it would not cost much, if any, more than "MEGASSE."

Bamboo, Considered as a Paper-making Material — Part 20

It is hardly my province to discuss here to which of the two materials, "MEGASSE" or "BAMBOO," the preference should be given. Suffice it to say that, with "_the admitted fact_" of the increasing scarcity of _Raw Material_ for Paper-making, there is ample scope for both. I have only to add that I shall be happy to advise with parties who may desire to interest themselves in either question.

As I have broadly stated that "_Paper-Stock_" can be produced from both "BAMBOO" and "MEGASSE," to show a good _Profit_, it may be well to mention the present cost of "ESPARTO" reduced to the same condition (of "_Paper-Stock_"), as it is with this _Material_ these _Fibres_ would mainly have to compete, seeing that with its large consumption and widely extended use for most classes of Paper it now rules the Market.