[Footnote 12: Folwarczny, "Leberanalysen bei Diabetes Mellitus," _Wiener Zeitschr._, N. F., 1859, ii. 6.]
The kidneys, in cases which have continued some time, are apt to be hyperæmic and enlarged, although primarily they are uninvolved. It would seem that the long-continued hyperæmia which is a necessary condition of the copious secretion of urine, results, sooner or later, in an over-nutrition of the renal epithelium, a widening of the tubules, and consequent enlargement of the whole organ. The changes are mainly of a parenchymatous or catarrhal rather than an interstitial nature, the epithelium being disposed to shed. These changes may reach a more advanced stage of cellular degeneration, and may be attended by albuminuria. The cells may become very large, present a yellowish-brown color, their nuclei indistinct and non-responsive to ordinary staining solutions, but may take a red stain with a weak solution of iodine, similar to that described in the case of the liver-cells. Mackenzie describes a hyaline degeneration of the intima of the arterioles and a skeleton condition of the epithelium of the collecting tubes.[13] There may also be a catarrh of the pelves of the kidneys and ureters, due to irritation of the saccharine urine.
Atrophy of the testes has been noted by Romberg and Seegen in young men, and recently Hofmeier[14] has reported the case of a young diabetic woman, aged twenty, who came under observation for pruritus vulvæ, in whom the uterus was found small, scarcely 5 cm. (2 inches) long, and the ovaries very much atrophied. As this young woman had no other ailment, the atrophy was ascribed to the diabetes.
[Footnote 14: _Berliner klin. Wochenschr._, 1883, No. 42.]
Among the most constant secondary lesions is the aggregate of changes known as those of pulmonary phthisis. But a few years ago, when our ideas on this subject were more definite than they are to-day, and when it was thought we had three distinct varieties of phthisis--the tubercular, the catarrhal, and the fibroid--the phthisis of diabetes was regarded as typically catarrhal.[15] At the present time, however, when the tendency at least is to regard all phthisis as tubercular, diabetic phthisis must be consigned to the same category. At the same time, if the tubercle bacillus is to be regarded as the essential criterion of tuberculosis, it must be stated that the diabetic patient is subject to two different lung processes--at least if the observations of Riegel of Giessen[16] are to be regarded as correct. In two cases of diabetic phthisis studied at his clinic, the sputum of one contained numerous bacilli, while the other, although the case presented the most distinct signs of infiltration of the apex, and although more than fifty preparations were investigated, revealed none. The sputum was also said to present some unusual physical characters. So far as I know, no autopsies of cases showing these clinical differences have been reported, although there have been found in diabetes, distinct from the usual cheesy foci, fibroid changes with small smooth-walled cavities. In such cases { 203} tubercle bacilli would be absent, while the physical signs of consolidation would be present.